Drools › Drools: User forum

5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Classic

List

Threaded

19 messages Options

TonyN

5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

manstis

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

manstis

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

repository_export.zip (675K) Download Attachment

manstis

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

In reply to this post by manstis

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

TonyN

RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types' text area widget

a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types' text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

manstis

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

Looks like a different bug to the one I fixed :(

My fix related to when a POJO model is uploaded and the imports automatically generated. The drop-down you have identified still needs fixing.

The "Advanced view" is the work-around at present (but you should find the imports are all present and correct after uploading a POJO JAR).

Would you be so kind as to raise another JIRA (and assign to me)?

Thanks,

Mike

On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget

    a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

    b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

   Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

   a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

   b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

TonyN

RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Mike,

I was trying to re-import the old POJO to see how the classes are imported and ran into this error:

1) Create/upload new POJO

2) Entering in new name

3) Hit OK

4) Get the below error.

Also failed when trying to update existing model....what's going on?

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:49 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget

    a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

    b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

   Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

   a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

   b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017917.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

manstis

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

That error, I can only guess at.

Your screenshot shows two sessions to (presumably the same) Guvnor instance (i.e. 2 browser windows).

Is there any possibility you changed the same asset in the two sessions?

With a single session I can create a new POJO model, or uploaded new content to an existing POJO model, in a package without problem.

BCC'ed a colleague who might have seen it before....

Jervis, any ideas?

On 13 June 2012 18:08, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Mike,

I was trying to re-import the old POJO to see how the classes are imported and ran into this error:

1) Create/upload new POJO

2) Entering in new name

3) Hit OK

4) Get the below error.

Also failed when trying to update existing model....what's going on?

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:49 AM

To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

Looks like a different bug to the one I fixed :(

My fix related to when a POJO model is uploaded and the imports automatically generated. The drop-down you have identified still needs fixing.

The "Advanced view" is the work-around at present (but you should find the imports are all present and correct after uploading a POJO JAR).

Would you be so kind as to raise another JIRA (and assign to me)?

Thanks,

Mike

On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget

    a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

    b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

   Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

   a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

   b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
<a href="tel:<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086" value="<a href="tel:%2B17148961086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">+17148961086" target="_blank"><a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017917.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

TonyN

RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

The 2 sessions that you saw were actually 2 different guvnors running on 2 different application servers...one was running 5.2.0 Final and the other is 5.4.0 Final

But in any case, I closed both and retried again (5.4.0 final) and still the same problem...

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:48 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

On 13 June 2012 18:08, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Mike,

I was trying to re-import the old POJO to see how the classes are imported and ran into this error:

1) Create/upload new POJO

2) Entering in new name

3) Hit OK

4) Get the below error.

Also failed when trying to update existing model....what's going on?

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:49 AM

To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

Looks like a different bug to the one I fixed :(

My fix related to when a POJO model is uploaded and the imports automatically generated. The drop-down you have identified still needs fixing.

The "Advanced view" is the work-around at present (but you should find the imports are all present and correct after uploading a POJO JAR).

Would you be so kind as to raise another JIRA (and assign to me)?

Thanks,

Mike

On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget

    a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

    b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

   Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

   a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

   b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
<a href="tel:<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086" value="<a href="tel:%2B17148961086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">+17148961086" target="_blank"><a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017917.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017922.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

TonyN

RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

In reply to this post by manstis

Hi Mike,

I am trying to raise an JRA issue (per your email below) but running into NAML issue

Error:

Oops... An error has occurred

Please contact Nabble Support and explain what you did to cause this error. Your feedback is very important to us.

Go to NAML Editor

More Details

Error 500

macroName is null

Message: macroName is null

RequestURI: /template/NamlServlet.jtp

Server: n3.nabble.com

Caused by:

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:49 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget

    a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

    b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

   Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

   a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

   b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017917.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

manstis

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

That looks like a nabble error, AFAIK it's definately nothing to do with JIRA.

You should be able to simply go to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR (login with a JBoss Community login, creating an account if need be) and create a new issue.

If raising one for the javax.jcr.InvalidStateException as well please ensure you include all steps to reproduce the error.

Thanks,

Mike

On 13 June 2012 20:44, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Mike,

I am trying to raise an JRA issue (per your email below) but running into NAML issue

Error:

Oops... An error has occurred
Please contact Nabble Support and explain what you did to cause this error. Your feedback is very important to us.
Go to NAML Editor

More Details
Error 500
macroName is null
Message: macroName is null

RequestURI: /template/NamlServlet.jtp

Server: n3.nabble.com

Caused by:
From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:49 AM

To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

Looks like a different bug to the one I fixed :(

My fix related to when a POJO model is uploaded and the imports automatically generated. The drop-down you have identified still needs fixing.

The "Advanced view" is the work-around at present (but you should find the imports are all present and correct after uploading a POJO JAR).

Would you be so kind as to raise another JIRA (and assign to me)?

Thanks,

Mike

On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget

    a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

    b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

   Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

   a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

   b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
<a href="tel:<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086" value="<a href="tel:%2B17148961086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">+17148961086" target="_blank"><a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017917.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

TonyN

RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

In reply to this post by manstis

Correction...trying to do a 'login' or 'reply' in Drools: User Forum and ran into below error...

From: Nguyen, Tony N
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 12:44 PM
To: 'manstis [via Drools]'
Subject: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Mike,

I am trying to raise an JRA issue (per your email below) but running into NAML issue

Error:

Oops... An error has occurred

Please contact Nabble Support and explain what you did to cause this error. Your feedback is very important to us.

Go to NAML Editor

More Details

Error 500

macroName is null

Message: macroName is null

RequestURI: /template/NamlServlet.jtp

Server: n3.nabble.com

Caused by:

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:49 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget

    a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

    b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

   Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

   a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

   b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017917.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

manstis

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Still don't know what the immediate problem is ;)

Just copy the given URL, paste into your favorite browser.....

On 13 June 2012 21:36, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Correction...trying to do a 'login' or 'reply' in Drools: User Forum and ran into below error...

From: Nguyen, Tony N
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 12:44 PM
To: 'manstis [via Drools]'
Subject: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873
Hi Mike,

I am trying to raise an JRA issue (per your email below) but running into NAML issue

Error:

Oops... An error has occurred
Please contact Nabble Support and explain what you did to cause this error. Your feedback is very important to us.
Go to NAML Editor

More Details
Error 500
macroName is null
Message: macroName is null

RequestURI: /template/NamlServlet.jtp

Server: n3.nabble.com

Caused by:
From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:49 AM

To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

Looks like a different bug to the one I fixed :(

My fix related to when a POJO model is uploaded and the imports automatically generated. The drop-down you have identified still needs fixing.

The "Advanced view" is the work-around at present (but you should find the imports are all present and correct after uploading a POJO JAR).

Would you be so kind as to raise another JIRA (and assign to me)?

Thanks,

Mike

On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget

    a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

    b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

   Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

   a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

   b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
<a href="tel:<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086" value="<a href="tel:%2B17148961086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">+17148961086" target="_blank"><a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017917.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

TonyN

RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

In reply to this post by manstis

I just opened a JIRA ticket (GUVNOR-1911) but has no way to assign to you (but I have requested to be assigned to you, Mike)

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 1:35 PM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

On 13 June 2012 20:44, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Mike,

I am trying to raise an JRA issue (per your email below) but running into NAML issue

Error:

Oops... An error has occurred
Please contact Nabble Support and explain what you did to cause this error. Your feedback is very important to us.
Go to NAML Editor

More Details
Error 500
macroName is null
Message: macroName is null

RequestURI: /template/NamlServlet.jtp

Server: n3.nabble.com

Caused by:
From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:49 AM

To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

Looks like a different bug to the one I fixed :(

My fix related to when a POJO model is uploaded and the imports automatically generated. The drop-down you have identified still needs fixing.

The "Advanced view" is the work-around at present (but you should find the imports are all present and correct after uploading a POJO JAR).

Would you be so kind as to raise another JIRA (and assign to me)?

Thanks,

Mike

On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget

    a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

    b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

   Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

   a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

   b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
<a href="tel:<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086" value="<a href="tel:%2B17148961086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">+17148961086" target="_blank"><a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017917.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017925.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

manstis

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Thanks.

I've assigned to me.

Hope to fix one quiet evening soon.

On 13 June 2012 21:54, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

I just opened a JIRA ticket (GUVNOR-1911) but has no way to assign to you (but I have requested to be assigned to you, Mike)

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 1:35 PM

To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

That looks like a nabble error, AFAIK it's definately nothing to do with JIRA.

You should be able to simply go to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR (login with a JBoss Community login, creating an account if need be) and create a new issue.

If raising one for the javax.jcr.InvalidStateException as well please ensure you include all steps to reproduce the error.

Thanks,

Mike
On 13 June 2012 20:44, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Mike,

I am trying to raise an JRA issue (per your email below) but running into NAML issue

Error:

Oops... An error has occurred
Please contact Nabble Support and explain what you did to cause this error. Your feedback is very important to us.
Go to NAML Editor

More Details
Error 500
macroName is null
Message: macroName is null

RequestURI: /template/NamlServlet.jtp

Server: n3.nabble.com

Caused by:
From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:49 AM

To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

Looks like a different bug to the one I fixed :(

My fix related to when a POJO model is uploaded and the imports automatically generated. The drop-down you have identified still needs fixing.

The "Advanced view" is the work-around at present (but you should find the imports are all present and correct after uploading a POJO JAR).

Would you be so kind as to raise another JIRA (and assign to me)?

Thanks,

Mike
On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mike,

thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:

1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'

3) Build Package

4) Got a 'Success' result.

5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget

    a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'

    b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'

   Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?

To show the failure:

1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types'  text area widget.

2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)

   a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset

   b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference

Note: Notice the '$' convention.

3) Save work

4) Build package

5) Will get errors

I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
<a href="tel:<a href="tel:<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086" value="<a href="tel:%2B17148961086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">+17148961086" target="_blank"><a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086" value="<a href="tel:%2B17148961086" value="<a href="tel:%2B17148961086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">+17148961086" target="_blank"><a href="tel:%2B17148961086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">+17148961086" target="_blank"><a href="tel:<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086" value="<a href="tel:%2B17148961086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">+17148961086" target="_blank"><a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

I tested again and it appears fine for me.

I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the following steps:-

1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.

I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1).

It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen).

With kind regards,

Mike

On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sure will do.

On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873

Wondering if you can take a look...

thx,
Tony

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017917.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017925.html

To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click here.
NAML

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

TonyN

RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Another JIRA ticket for the javax.jcr.InvalidStateException issue. (GUVNOR-1912).

thx,

tony

TonyN

RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

In reply to this post by manstis

Hi Mike,

Whenever you have sometimes, could you take a look at the issue in the user forum that I filed on Oct 22^nd, 2012? Many thanks

Guvnor 5.4 BRL parsing issue

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
714-896-1086
[hidden email]

manstis

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Tony,

Filing issues on user forums is the quickest way to ensure the problem is forgotten at the soonest opportunity as we do not have the resources to manage everything. The best place is always a JIRA.

Please also understand this is a community project, not paid support, and all reported issues are dealt with on a best endeavors basis depending on severity and the mountain of other work we have to do.

Please familiarize yourself with http://blog.athico.com/2011/04/drools-jbpm-community-versus-product.html

Of course, being a community, we always welcome pull requests for issues or enhancements we ourselves may not have had time to address.

How to get involved : http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.CR1/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html

An example of a community contribution : http://blog.athico.com/2012/10/scorecards-and-pmml41-support-for.html

With kind regards,

Mike

On 23 October 2012 17:51, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Mike,

Whenever you have sometimes, could you take a look at the issue in the user forum that I filed on Oct 22^nd, 2012? Many thanks

Guvnor 5.4 BRL parsing issue

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company

<a href="tel:714-896-1086" value="+17148961086" target="_blank">714-896-1086
[hidden email]

View this message in context: RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

TonyN

RE: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Got it..thanks!

Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
714-896-1086
[hidden email]

From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:16 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873